August 2,
2013
Contact: Andrew Dobbs, Texas Campaign
for the Environment (512) 326-5655, dobbs@texasenvironment.org
Matt
Prindiville, Product Policy Institute, (207) 902-0054, matt@productpolicy.org
Environmental Groups Target Battery
Maker Rayovac for Bad Record on Recycling
Texas group leads the effort to press number 3 battery
maker to catch up to competitors
A coalition of environmental groups have announced a
campaign to press Rayovac, a major battery manufacturer, to step up their
efforts on recycling and waste reduction. Texas Campaign for the
Environment—TCE, a nonprofit, grassroots group known for its work on electronic
waste recycling—asked Rayovac in May to begin taking back their batteries for
recycling. Now TCE has been joined by 26 other organizations from across the
country calling on Rayovac , to provide recycling for their batteries in
the U.S., as they do in Europe.
“Rayovac is falling behind their competitors when it comes
to battery recycling, and it’s past time for them to join these efforts toward
sustainability,” Robin Schneider, Executive Director of Texas Campaign for the
Environment said. “We want them to take back their batteries for recycling, to
set meaningful goals for these collections and to support legislation which
would create a level playing field for battery recycling. These solutions have
worked for electronics and a variety of other products nationwide, and now we
want Rayovac to help make it a reality for batteries.”
Rayovac is one of the four largest manufacturers of
single-use batteries. Duracell, Energizer and Panasonic have all taken steps
towards establishing battery takeback recycling for consumers. These companies
have formed the Corporation for Battery Recycling, but Rayovac pulled out of
the group and instead instructs its customers to dispose of their batteries in
the household trash. Single-use batteries are banned from disposal in
California and Europe, and are considered “universal waste” by the EPA—a
category of widely produced, potentially hazardous products which should be
kept out of normal disposal streams whenever possible. Rayovac also produces
rechargeable batteries which are toxic and even more widely banned from
disposal.
“People ask me all the time about what they should do with
their spent batteries, and unfortunately in most places we don’t have good options”
said Matt Prindiville, Associate Director for the Product Policy Institute, a
national environmental advocacy organization working to make products and
packaging more sustainable. “Now, a
group of battery manufacturers has come forward to set up recycling programs,
but Rayovac, one of the largest manufacturers, has pulled out. Apparently, they’re comfortable with letting
other people clean up their mess. This
is unacceptable.”
Texas Campaign for the Environment privately called upon
Rayovac, as well as lighting manufacturers Philips, GE and Sylvania to take
their products back for recycling in May, and Rayovac, Philips and Sylvania
responded with a refusal in June. Most modern lighting is also toxic, and
major manufacturers have declined to offer their consumers responsible
solutions for disposal or recycling. TCE was joined in their public response by
organizations from 11 states, including:
·
Recycle Worlds Consulting, based in Madison,
Wisconsin
·
Clean Water Action Council of Northeast
Wisconsin
·
Northeast Wisconsin Zero Waste Coalition
·
ReThink Wisconsin, a University of
Wisconsin-Madison student group
·
Nothing Left to Waste, based in Minneapolis,
Minnesota
·
Eureka Recycling, based in Minneapolis,
Minnesota
·
Michigan Clean Water Action
·
the New Jersey Environmental Federation
·
Rhode Island Clean Water Action
·
Massachusetts Clean Water Action
·
California Clean Water Action
·
The Product Policy Institute, a national
organization headquartered in Rockland, Maine
·
Safe Minds, a national organization
headquartered in Huntington Beach, California
·
Citizens’ Campaign for the Environment, based in
Farmingdale, New York and Hamden, Connecticut
·
Clean and Healthy New York, based in Albandy,
New York
·
Vermont Public Interest Research Group, based in
Montpelier, Vermont
·
Zero Waste Detroit
·
CRADLE2, based in Augusta, Maine
·
Sustainable Energy and Economic Development
(SEED) Coalition, based in Austin, Texas
·
Basel Action Network, an international
organization based in Seattle, Washington
·
Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA),
an international organization based in Berkeley, California
·
Electronics Takeback Coalition, based in San
Francisco, California
·
International Campaign for Responsible
Technology, based in San Jose, California
·
Eco-Cycle, based in Boulder, Colorado
TCE hopes to bring groups from around the country together
in a widespread, creative campaign to change the companies’ policies. The group
was especially encouraged by the support found in Wisconsin, home to Rayovac’s
parent company, Spectrum Brands.
“We are not afraid to take on big companies that are doing
too little for the planet,” Schneider said. “We are also excited when we
get to move from opposition to cooperation, and we expect that Rayovac and the
lighting companies will make changes sooner rather than later. Until then, we
intend to organize support to hold these irresponsible companies accountable.”
I believe that it is very important that we dispose our batteries to proper disposal areas rather than just throwing it anywhere which is very harmful when seepage happens to our water reservoir. Observing proper disposal and recycling of these batteries is very crucial. If there are other valuable products from recycling batteries then it is our safety that I think Rayovac has neglected. -www.probatterytx.com
ReplyDelete